欧盟评估硫酸氢钠作为除水生动物外所有动物饲料添加剂的安全性和有效?/h1>
放大字体缩小字体时间?024-03-12 13:41 来源:食品伙伴网 作者: 泽夕
核心提示?024??1日,据欧盟食品安全局(EFSA)消息,应欧盟委员会要求,欧盟动物饲料添加剂和产品(FEEDAP)研究小组就硫酸氢钠(sodium bisulphate)作为除水生动物外所有动物饲料添加剂的安全性和有效性发表科学意见、/div>
   食品伙伴网讯2024??1日,?a href='//www.sqrdapp.com/news/tag_1377.html' class='zdbq' title='欧盟食品安全局相关食品资讯' target='_blank'>欧盟食品安全局'a href='//www.sqrdapp.com/news/tag_10.html' class='zdbq' title='EFSA相关食品资讯' target='_blank'>EFSA)消息,应欧盟委员会要求,欧盞a href='//www.sqrdapp.com/news/tag_4566.html' class='zdbq' title='动物相关食品资讯' target='_blank'>动物 饲料添加剁/a>和产品(FEEDAP)研究小组就 硫酸氢钠(sodium bisulphate)作为除 水生动物外所有动物饲料添加剂的安全性和有效性发表科学意见
  经过评估,专家小组认为在建议的使用条件下该添加剂对所有陆生动物物种、消费者和环境是安全的。在授权更新的情况下,没有必要评估添加剂的功效。部分原文报道如下:
  Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of authorisation of sodium bisulphate (SBS) as a feed additive for all terrestrial animal species (category: technological additive; functio nal group: preservative), and for all terrestrial animal species other than cats, mink, pets and other non-food-producing animals (category: technological additive; functio nal group: acidity regulator). EFSA has also been asked to assess the new use of the product as an acidity regulator and flavouring compound in all pets and other non-food-producing animals except aquatic animals. The applicant provided evidence that the additive currently in the market complies with the existing co nditions of authorisation. There is no evidence that would lead the FEEDAP Panel to reco nsider its previous conclusions. Thus, the Panel co ncluded that the additive remains safe for all terrestrial animal species, co nsumer and the enviro nment under the authorised co nditions of use. The FEEDAP Panel co nsiders that the proposed new use would not introduce risks not already co nsidered in the previous assessment and therefore the same co nclusions on all terrestrial animal species, co nsumers of products from animals fed the additive and the enviro nment would apply. Regarding user safety, the additive is irritant to the skin, eyes and the respiratory tract, and should be co nsidered a skin and respiratory sensitiser. There is no need to assess the efficacy of the additive in the co ntext of the renewal of the authorisation. The Panel co nsiders that the additive has the potential to be efficacious as an acidity regulator and sensory additive (flavouring compound) in feed for pet and non-food-producing animals (except aquatic animals).
   本文由食品伙伴网食品资讯中心编辑,有任何疑问,请联系news@www.sqrdapp.com、/span>
日期9a href="//www.sqrdapp.com/news/2024-03-12.html">2024-03-12
[ 食品资讯搜索] [ 加入收藏] [ 告诉好友] [ 打印本文] [ 关闭窗口]


推荐图文
食品伙伴网资讯部 电话?535-2122172 传真?535-2129828 邮箱:news@www.sqrdapp.com QQ: 点击这里给我发消? title=
鲁公网安 37060202000128叶/a>
Baidu
map