最新搜索：
当前位置: 首页? 食品资讯? 外讯导读? 欧盟确定6种不需要审查最大残留限量的活性物?/a>

欧盟确定6种不需要审查最大残留限量的活性物?/h1>
放大字体缩小字体时间?023-02-14 14:40 来源：食品伙伴网 作者： 泽夕
核心提示?023??3日，欧盟食品安全局（EFSA）发?种不需要审查最大残留限量的活性物质、/div>
　　 食品伙伴网讯2023??3日， 欧盟食品安全局＇a href='//www.sqrdapp.com/news/tag_10.html' class='zdbq' title='EFSA相关食品资讯' target='_blank'>EFSA）发?种不需要审?a href='//www.sqrdapp.com/news/tag_4480.html' class='zdbq' title='最大残留限量相关食品资? target='_blank'>最大残留限野/a>的活性物质
　　?种活性物质为绿磺隆（Chlorsulfuron）、氟环唑（Epoxiconazole）、棕色绿僵菌菌株Ma 43（me tarhizium brunneum strain Ma 43）、植物油/香茅油（Plant oils/Citro nella oil）、直链鳞翅目信息素（Straight chain Lepidopteran pheromones）和苯唑草酮（Topramezone）。部分原文报道如下：
　　Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 establishes the rules governing the setting and the review of pesticide maximum residue levels (MRLs) at European level. According to Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, EFSA shall provide within 12 mo nths from the date of the inclusion or non-inclusion of an active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC a reaso ned opinion on the review of the existing MRLs for that active substance. Among the substances that need to be reviewed under Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, EFSA identified six active substances for which a review of MRLs is no lo nger co nsidered necessary. EFSA prepared a statement explaining the reasons why a review of MRLs for these substances became obsolete. The relevant question numbers are co nsidered addressed by this statement.
　　更多详情参见：https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7723
　　 本文由食品伙伴网食品资讯中心编辑，有任何疑问，请联系news@www.sqrdapp.com、/span>

相关政策解读

欧盟食品快速预警系统知多少

日期９a href="//www.sqrdapp.com/news/2023-02-14.html">2023-02-14
地区９/font>欧盟国外
行业９/font>进出叢/font>
标签９/font>最大残留限野/font>欧盟食品安全局EFSA
科普９/font>最大残留限野/font>欧盟食品安全局EFSA
    分享:
[ 食品资讯搜索] [ 加入收藏] [ 告诉好友] [ 打印本文] [ 关闭窗口]

欧盟食品安全局相关食品资讯
食品论坛相关讨论
    行业相关食品资讯
    地区相关食品资讯

    Baidu
    map