　　 食品伙伴网讯2021�?�?7日，欧盟食品安全局＇�a href='//www.sqrdapp.com/news/tag_10.html' class='zdbq' title='EFSA相关食品资讯' target='_blank'>EFSA）发布关于不同基质传�?a href='//www.sqrdapp.com/news/tag_2536.html' class='zdbq' title='非洲猪瘟相关食品资讯' target='_blank'>非洲猪瘟病毒能力的报告�

　　本报告评估了不同基质将非洲猪瘟病�?ASFV)引入欧盟非疫区所带来的风险。评估的基质是饲料、浓�?铺垫材料和从受影响地区返回的空生猪运输车。尽管认为饲料的风险低于其他几种途径(如接触受感染的活体动物和泔水喂养)，但不能排除以这种观点评估的基质会带来风险。部分原文报道如下：

　　This opinion assesses the risk posed by different matrices to introduce African swine fever virus (ASFV) to non‐affected regions of the EU. Matrices assessed are feed materials, enrichment/bedding materials and empty live pigs transport vehicles returning from affected areas. Although the risk from feed is co nsidered to be lower than several other pathways (e.g. co ntact with infected live animals and swill feeding), it cannot be ruled out that matrices assessed in this opinion pose a risk. Evidence on survival of ASFV in different matrices from literature and a public co nsultation was used in an Expert Knowledge Elicitation (EKE) on the possible co ntamination of products and traded or im ported product volumes used on pig farms. The EKE results were used in a model that provided a risk‐rank for each product's co ntamination likelihood (��q��), its trade or im port volume from affected EU or Eurasian areas (N) and the modelled number of potentially infected pig farms (N �� q). The products ranking higher regardless of origin or destination were mash and pelleted compound feed, feed additives and cereals. Bedding/enrichment materials, hydrolysed proteins and blood products ranked lowest regardless of origin or destination. Empty vehicles ranked lower than compound feed but higher than non‐compound feed or bedding/enrichment material. It is very likely (95�C99% certainty) that compound feed and cereals rank higher than feed materials, which rank higher than bedding/enrichment material and forage. As this is an assessment ba sed on several parameters including the co ntamination and delivery to a pig farm, all of which have the same impact on the final ranking, risk managers should co nsider how the relative rank of each product may change with an effective storage period or a virus inactivation step.

　　更多详情参见：https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6558

　　本文由食品伙伴网食品资讯中心编辑，供网友参考，有任何疑问，请联系news@www.sqrdapp.com、�/span>

? 欧盟食品安全局就锰的安全摄入量发表科学意见
? 欧盟食品安全局发布2022年传染性海绵状脑病监测	? 欧盟评估α-半乳糖苷酶和内切-1,4-β-葡聚糖酶	? 欧盟食品安全局更新嘧菌胺农药风险评估的同行诃�/a>

欧盟评估转基因玉米MO	美国FDA拟制定一种新
欧盟评估一种麦芽糖淀	美国拟撤销若干肉类叉�/a>

欧盟发布关于不同基质传播非洲猪瘟病毒能力的报呉�/h1> 时间�?021-04-28 10:18 来源：食品伙伴网 作者： 泽夕

相关政策解读