食品伙伴网讯2020??1日，?a href='//www.sqrdapp.com/news/tag_1377.html' class='zdbq' title='欧盟食品安全局相关食品资讯' target='_blank'>欧盟食品安全局＇a href='//www.sqrdapp.com/news/tag_10.html' class='zdbq' title='EFSA相关食品资讯' target='_blank'>EFSA）消息，欧盟
食品添加剁/a>咋a href='//www.sqrdapp.com/news/tag_343.html' class='zdbq' title='调味剂相关食品资? target='_blank'>调味剁/a>小组 FAF ）重新评估了偎a href='//www.sqrdapp.com/news/tag_2750.html' class='zdbq' title='酒石酸相关食品资? target='_blank'>酒石酷/a> （metatartaricacid （E 353）作为食品添加剂的安全性、/div>
经过评估，专家小组认为在规定的用途和使用水平下，偏酒石酸作为食品添加剂不存在安全问题。部分原文报道如下：
The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings （FAF provided a scientific opinion re‐e
valuating the safety of me
tatartaric acid （E 353 when used as a food additive. me
tatartaric acid （E 353 had been previously e
valuated by the Scientific Committee on Food （SCF and Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives （JECFA） ba
sed on the presumption that me
tatartaric acid is fully hydrolysed pre‐systemically to l?）‐tartaric acid, the Panel co
ncluded that me
tatartaric acid （E 353 should be included in the group acceptable daily intake （ADI of 240 mg/kg body weight （bw per day, expressed as tartaric acid, for l?）‐tartaric acid‐tartrates （E 334-337, 354 which was established by the EFSA FAF Panel in 2020. Exposure estimates were calculated for me
tatartaric acid （E 353 using a maximum level and refined exposure assessment scenario. The Panel also co
ncluded that there is no safety co
ncern for the use of me
tatartaric acid （E 353 at the reported use and use level. The Panel made a number of recommendations.
本文由食品伙伴网食品资讯中心编辑，供网友参考，欢迎转载，转载请注明出处！有任何疑问，请联系news@www.sqrdapp.com、/span>
地区９/font>
欧盟评估转基因玉米MO
欧盟评估一种麦芽糖淀
美国拟撤销若干肉类叉/a>
鲁公网安 37060202000128叶/a>
