当前位置: 首页? 政策法规? 国外法规? 美国环境保护署豁免Purpureocillium lilacinum Strain 251在食品中的残留限野/a>

美国环境保护署豁免Purpureocillium lilacinum Strain 251在食品中的残留限野/h1>
扫描二维 分享好友和朋友圈
放大字体缩小字体2019-12-25 04:41:22 来源9a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/12/20/2019-27378/purpureocillium-lilacinum-strain-251-amendment-to-the-exemption-from-the-requirement-of-a-tolerance" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">美国环境保护罱/a> 浏览次数9span id="hits">8993
核心提示:美国环境保护署豁免Purpureocillium lilacinum Strain 251的残留物在所有食品和饲料商品上的残留限量。使用时根据标签说明和良好农业规范使用、/div>
发布单位
美国环境保护
美国环境保护罱/div>
发布文号 84 FR 70021
发布日期 2019-12-20 生效日期 2019-12-20
有效性状?/th> 废止日期 暂无
属?/th> 法规 专业属?/th> 限量相关
备注 美国环境保护署豁免Purpureocillium lilacinum Strain 251的残留物在所有食品和饲料商品上的残留限量。使用时根据标签说明和良好农业规范使用、/td>

AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION:

Final rule.

SUMMARY:

This regulation amends the existing tolerance exemption for residues of Paecilomyces lilacinus strain 251 in or on all food commodities due to a scientific reclassification of the substance as Purpureocillium lilacinum. Bayer CropScience LP submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting this amendment. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for residues of Purpureocillium lilacinum strain 251 under FFDCA.

DATES:

This regulation is effective December 20, 2019. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before February 18, 2020, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in40 CFR part 178(see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES:

The docket for this action, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0526, is available athttp://www.regulations.govor at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information about the docket available athttp://www.epa.gov/?dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert McNally, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address:BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include:

  • Crop production (NAICS code 111).
  • Animal production (NAICS code 112).
  • Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
  • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

You may access a frequently updated electronic version of40 CFR part 180through the Government Publishing Office's e-CFR site athttp://www.ecfr.gov/?cgi-bin/?text-idx??&?c=?ecfr&?tpl=?/?ecfrbrowse/?Title40/?40tab_?02.tpl.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

Under FFDCA section 408(g),21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0526 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before February 18, 2020. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are provided in40 CFR 178.25(b).

In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential pursuant to40 CFR part 2may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0526, by one of the following methods:

  • Federal eRulemaking Portal:http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
  • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001.
  • Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions athttp://www.epa.gov/?dockets/?contacts.html. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available athttp://www.epa.gov/?dockets.

II. Background

In the Federal Register of December 15, 2017 (82 FR 59604) (FRL-9970-50), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3),21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance petition (PP 7F8547) by Bayer CropScience, LP, 2 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. The petition requested that40 CFR 180.1257be amended by changing the name of the microbial from Paecilomyces lilacinus strain 251 to Purpureocillium lilacinum strain 251. That document referenced a summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner Bayer CropScience LP, which is available in the docket viahttp://www.regulations.gov. Although comments submitted to the docket for this notice of filing, none were relevant to this tolerance rulemaking.

III. Final Rule

A. EPA's Safety Determination

Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the exemption is safe. Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA Start Printed Page 70022defines safe to mean that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information. This includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings but does not include occupational exposure. Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance or tolerance exemption, and to ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue . . . . Additionally, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D) requires that EPA consider available information concerning the cumulative effects of [a particular pesticide's] . . . residues and other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.

The species lilacinus, formerly considered within the genus Paecilomyces, has been moved to the genus Purpureocillium and renamed lilacinum. The new taxonomy is presented in a 2011 scientific paper discussed and referenced in EPA's supporting document mentioned later in this paragraph. The strain-specific features and properties, including toxicological aspects of Paecilomyces lilacinus strain 251, have not changed due to the name change. Therefore, the risk assessments and tolerance exemption rationale for Paecilomyces lilacinus strain 251 apply to the new taxonomic classification, Purpureocillium lilacinum strain 251.

EPA evaluated the available toxicity and exposure data on Purpureocillium lilacinum strain 251 and considered its validity, completeness, and reliability, as well as the relationship of this information to human risk. A full explanation of the data upon which EPA relied and its risk assessment based on that data can be found within the document entitled Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) Safety Determination for Purpureocillium lilacinum strain 251. This document, as well as other relevant information, is available in the docket for this action as described under ADDRESSES. based upon its evaluation, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the U.S. population, including infants and children, from aggregate exposure to residues of Purpureocillium lilacinum strain 251. Therefore, the existing tolerance exemption for Paecilomyces lilacinus strain 251 is amended by updating the name of the exempt substance from Paecilomyces lilacinus strain 251 to Purpureocillium lilacinum strain 251.

B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

An analytical method is not required for Purpureocillium lilacinum strain 251 because EPA is amending an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance without any numerical limitation.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

This action establishes a tolerance exemption under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition submitted to EPA. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject toExecutive Order 13211,entitled Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), orExecutive Order 13045,entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a regulatory action underExecutive Order 13771,entitled Reducing Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act,44 U.S.C. 3501et seq., nor does it require any special considerations underExecutive Order 12898,entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance exemption in this action, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601et seq.) do not apply.

This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes. As a result, this action does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, EPA has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal governments, on the relationship between the National Government and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, EPA has determined thatExecutive Order 13132,entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), andExecutive Order 13175,entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501et seq.).

This action does not involve any technical standards that would require EPA's consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (15 U.S.C. 272note).

V. Congressional Review Act

Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801et seq.), EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a major rule as defined by5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in40 CFR Part 180

  • Environmental protection
  • Administrative practice and procedure
  • Agricultural commodities
  • Pesticides and pests
  • Reporting and recordkeeping requirements

Dated: November 20, 2019.

Robert McNally,

Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180[AMENDED]

1.The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

Authority:21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

2.Revise ?180.1257 to read as follows:

?180.1257
Purpureocillium lilacinum strain 251; exemption from the requirement of a tolerance.

An exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is established for residues Start Printed Page 70023of Purpureocillium lilacinum strain 251 in or on all food commodities when applied/used in accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices.

[FR Doc.2019-27378Filed 12-19-19; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

食品伙伴网提供标准法规解读、舆情监控、合规咨询、申报注册等服务、br/>电询?535-2129301
QQ?891238009
食品标法? border=
实时把握 食品标法动?/span>
请扫码关?span class="color2">食品标法圇/span>

声明9/p>

凡本网所有原?编译文章及图片、图表的版权均属食品伙伴网所有,如要转载,需注明“信息来源:食品伙伴网”、br> 凡本网注明“信息来源:XXX(非食品伙伴网)”的作品,均转载自其他媒体,转载目的在于传递更多的信息,并不代表本网赞同其观点和对其真实性负责、br> 邮箱:law#www.sqrdapp.com(发邮件时请?换成@ QQ?39307733

[ 政策法规搜索] [ 加入收藏] [ 告诉好友] [ 打印本文] [ 关闭窗口]

Baidu
map