当前位置: 首页? 政策法规? 国外法规? 美国修订螺虫乙酯(Spirotetramat)在芦笋中的残留限量要求

美国修订螺虫乙酯(Spirotetramat)在芦笋中的残留限量要求

扫描二维 分享好友和朋友圈
放大字体缩小字体2016-10-26 03:57:26 来源9a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/10/25/2016-25638/spirotetramat-pesticide-tolerance" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">美国联邦公报浏览次数9span id="hits">3481
核心提示?016?0?5日,美国环境保护署发文,新增螺虫乙酯(Spirotetramat)在芦笋中的残留限量要求,本条例自发布之日起生效、/div>
发布单位
美国环境保护
美国环境保护罱/div>
发布文号 81 FR 73342
发布日期 2016-10-25 生效日期 2016-10-25
有效性状?/th> 废止日期 暂无
属?/th> 法规 专业属?/th> 限量相关
备注 2016?0?5日,美国环境保护署发文,新增螺虫乙酯(Spirotetramat)在芦笋中的残留限量要求,本条例自发布之日起生效,如有反对意见或请求听证须根?0 CFR part 178中相关规定在2016?2?7日之前提出。螺虫乙酯及其代谢物或降解物在芦笋中或表面的残留限量?.01ppm、/td>

AGENCY:

ACTION:

SUMMARY:

This regulation is effective October 25, 2016. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before December 27, 2016, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

RDFRNotices@epa.gov

A. Does this action apply to me?

You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include:

  • B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl a, any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 . To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0679 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before December 27, 2016. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25 http://www.regulations.gov Follow the online Start Printed Page 73343 Mail: Hand Delivery: http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html II. Summary of Petitioned-for Tolerance

    of May 19, 2016 ( 81 FR 31581 ) (FRL-9946-02), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346 a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP 5E8376) by Bayer CropScience LP, P.O. Box 12014, 2 T.W. Alexander Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.641 http://www.regulations.gov A comment was received on the notice of filing. EPA's response to this comment is discussed in Unit IV.C.

    In one- and two-generation rat reproductive toxicity studies, male reproductive toxicity (abnormal sperm cells and reproductive performance) similar to that reported in subchronic toxicity studies with adult rats was reported in the first generation (F 1 in the document titled Spirotetramat. Human Health Risk Assessment for the Petition for a Tolerance for Residues in/on Asparagus Without a U.S. Registration POD is used as the basis for derivation of reference values for risk assessment. PODs are developed based on a careful analysis of the doses in each toxicological study to determine the dose at which no adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL) and the lowest dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified (the LOAEL). Uncertainty/safety factors are used in conjunction with the POD to calculate a safe exposure levelgenerally referred to as a population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a reference dose (RfD)and a safe margin of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes that any amount of exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the Agency estimates risk in terms of the probability of an occurrence of the adverse effect expected in a lifetime. For more information on the general principles EPA uses in risk characterization and a complete description of the risk assessment process, see http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/factsheets/riskassess.htm

    Table 1Summary of Toxicological Doses and Endpoints for Spirotetramat for Use in Human Health Risk Assessment

    Exposure/scenario Point of departure and uncertainty/ safety factors A = 10x UF H = 10x FQPA SF = 1xAcute RfD = 1.0 mg/kg/day aPAD = 1.0 mg/kg/day.Acute neurotoxicity (rat). LOAEL = 200 mg/kg based on clinical signs and decreased motor activity in males. A = 10x UF H = 10x FQPA SF = 1xChronic RfD = 0.05 mg/kg/day cPAD = 0.05 mg/kg/day.Chronic toxicity (dog). LOAEL = 20 mg/kg/day based on thymus involution in males. Cancer (Oral, dermal, inhalation) FQPA SF = Food Quality Protection Act Safety Factor. LOAEL = lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level. LOC = level of concern. mg/kg/day = milligram/kilogram/day. MOE = margin of exposure. NOAEL = no-observed-adverse-effect-level. PAD = population adjusted dose (a = acute, c = chronic). RfD = reference dose. UF = uncertainty factor. UF A = extrapolation from animal to human (interspecies). UF H = potential variation in sensitivity among members of the human population (intraspecies).

C. Exposure Assessment

In evaluating dietary exposure to spirotetramat, EPA considered exposure under the petitioned-for tolerances as well as all existing spirotetramat tolerances in 40 CFR 180.641 . EPA assessed dietary exposures from spirotetramat in food as follows:

i. Acute exposure. iii. Cancer. Modeled estimates of drinking water concentrations were directly entered into the dietary exposure model. For both the acute and chronic dietary risk assessments, the water concentration 3. From non-dietary exposure. Spirotetramat is currently registered for the following uses that could result in residential exposures: golf courses and residential citrus trees. The golf course use could result in potential post-application dermal exposure; however, there is no dermal hazard and therefore, quantification of dermal risk is not necessary. For the residential citrus tree use, because the product is sold in bulk packaging for agricultural uses and the label requires that handlers wear specific clothing ( e.g., long-sleeve shirt/long pants) and the use of personal-protective equipment ( e.g., Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency consider available information concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide's residues and other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.

http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children

3. Conclusion. EPA has determined that reliable data show the safety of infants and children would be adequately protected if the FQPA SF were reduced to 1x. That decision is based on the following findings:

3. Short- and Intermediate-term risk. A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

residuemethods@epa.gov B. International Residue Limits

C. Response to Comments

V. Conclusion

, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, , April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) ( 44 U.S.C. 3501et seq. Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) ( 5 U.S.C. 601et seq. This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this action alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined that Executive Order 13132, This action does not involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) ( 15 U.S.C. 272 VII. Congressional Review Act

Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act ( 5 U.S.C. 801et seq. ), EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register
地区9/font>美国
标签9/font>环境保护残留限量
食品伙伴网提供标准法规解读、舆情监控、合规咨询、申报注册等服务、br/>电询?535-2129301
QQ?891238009
食品标法? border=
实时把握 食品标法动?/span>
请扫码关?span class="color2">食品标法圇/span>

声明9/p>

凡本网所有原?编译文章及图片、图表的版权均属食品伙伴网所有,如要转载,需注明“信息来源:食品伙伴网”、br> 凡本网注明“信息来源:XXX(非食品伙伴网)”的作品,均转载自其他媒体,转载目的在于传递更多的信息,并不代表本网赞同其观点和对其真实性负责、br> 邮箱:law#www.sqrdapp.com(发邮件时请?换成@ QQ?39307733

[ 政策法规搜索] [ 加入收藏] [ 告诉好友] [ 打印本文] [ 关闭窗口]


按分类浏觇/strong>
推荐国外法规
点击排行
    按国家或地区浏览

    法规中心 关于我们 广告业务 联系我们 信息服务

    Processed in 0.097 second(s), 10 queries, Memory 4.77 M
    Baidu
    map