当前位置: 首页? 政策法规? 国外法规? (EU) No 1317/2013:就2,4-滴(2,4-D)、氟丁酰草胺(Beflubutamid)、环丙酰草胺(Cyclanilide)、烯唑醇(Diniconazole)、双氟磺草胺(Florasulam)、异丙甲草胺(Metolachlor)、精异丙甲草胺(S-metolachlor)和密灭汀(Milbemectin)在某些产品中最大残留限量修订法规(EC)No 396/2005附件II、III和V

(EU) No 1317/2013:就2,4-滴(2,4-D)、氟丁酰草胺(Beflubutamid)、环丙酰草胺(Cyclanilide)、烯唑醇(Diniconazole)、双氟磺草胺(Florasulam)、异丙甲草胺(Metolachlor)、精异丙甲草胺(S-metolachlor)和密灭汀(Milbemectin)在某些产品中最大残留限量修订法规(EC)No 396/2005附件II、III和V

扫描二维 分享好友和朋友圈
放大字体缩小字体2014-08-12 02:38:41 来源9a href="http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1407825481389&uri=CELEX:32013R1317" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">EUROPE浏览次数9span id="hits">4056
核心提示?013?2?7日,欧盟委员会发布委员会法规(EU)No 1317/2013,修订法规(EC)No 396/2005附件II、III和V中关?,4-滴(2,4-D)、氟丁酰草胺(Beflubutamid)、环丙酰草胺(Cyclanilide)、烯唑醇(Diniconazole)、双氟磺草胺(Florasulam)、异丙甲草胺(Metolachlor)、精异丙甲草胺(S-metolachlor)和密灭汀(Milbemectin)在多种产品中最大残留限量的规定、/div>
发布单位
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
发布文号 (EU) No 1317/2013
发布日期 2013-12-17 生效日期 暂无
有效性状?/th> 废止日期 暂无
备注 2013?2?7日,欧盟委员会发布委员会法规(EU)No 1317/2013,修订法规(EC)No 396/2005附件II、III和V中关?,4-滴(2,4-D)、氟丁酰草胺(Beflubutamid)、环丙酰草胺(Cyclanilide)、烯唑醇(Diniconazole)、双氟磺草胺(Florasulam)、异丙甲草胺(Metolachlor)、精异丙甲草胺(S-metolachlor)和密灭汀(Milbemectin)在多种产品中最大残留限量的规定。本法规自发布之日起?0天生效,并于2014??日实施、/td>

  COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1317/2013

  of 16 December 2013

  amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for 2,4-D, beflubutamid, cyclanilide, diniconazole, florasulam, metolachlor and S-metolachlor, and milbemectin in or on certain products

  (Text with EEA relevance)

  THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

  Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

  Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC (1), and in particular Article 14(1)(a), Article 18(1)(b) and Article 49(2) thereof,

  Whereas:

  (1)

  For 2,4-D, cyclanilide, florasulam, metolachlor and S-metolachlor, and milbemectin, maximum residue levels (MRLs) are set in Annex II and Part B of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. For beflubutamid and diniconazole, MRLs are set in Part A of Annex III to that Regulation.

  (2)

  Certain technical adaptations should be made, in particular the name of the active substance 'metholachlor and metholachlor-S' should be replaced by 'metolachlor and S-metolachlor'.

  (3)

  For 2,4-D, the European Food Safety Authority, hereinafter "the Authority", submitted a reasoned opinion on the existing MRLs in accordance with Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 in conjunction with Article 12(1) thereof (2). The Authority proposed to change the residue definition. It recommended raising or keeping the existing MRLs for certain products. It concluded that concerning the MRLs for almonds, brazil nuts, cashew nuts, coconuts, hazelnuts, macadamia, pecans, pine nuts, pistachios, walnuts, soya bean and buckwheat grain some information was not available and that further consideration by risk managers was required. As there is no risk for consumers, MRLs for those products should be set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 at the existing level or the level identified by the Authority. Those MRLs will be reviewed; the review will take into account the information available within two years from the publication of this Regulation.

  (4)

  For beflubutamid, the Authority submitted a reasoned opinion on the existing MRLs in accordance with Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 in conjunction with Article 12(1) thereof (3). It recommended lowering the MRL for wheat grain. For other products it recommended keeping the existing MRLs.

  (5)

  For cyclanilide, the Authority submitted a reasoned opinion on the existing MRLs in accordance with Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 in conjunction with Article 12(1) thereof (4). It recommended raising the existing MRL for cotton seed. However, as the approval of the active substance cyclanilide expired on 31 October 2011 (5) and all existing authorisations for plant protection products containing cyclanilide have been revoked, it is appropriate to set the MRLs at the specific limit of determination.

  (6)

  For diniconazole, the Authority submitted a reasoned opinion on the existing MRLs in accordance with Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 (6). It proposed to change the residue definition. All existing authorisations for plant protection products containing diniconazole-M have been revoked. It is therefore appropriate to set the MRLs at the specific limit of determination.

  (7)

  For florasulam, the Authority submitted a reasoned opinion on the existing MRLs in accordance with Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 in conjunction with Article 12(1) thereof (7). It recommended keeping the existing MRLs for certain products. It concluded that concerning the MRLs for meat, fat, liver and kidney of bovine animals, sheep and goat, as well as for cattle milk, sheep milk and goat milk some information was not available and that further consideration by risk managers was required. As there is no risk for consumers, MRLs for those products should be set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 at the level identified by the Authority. Those MRLs will be reviewed; the review will take into account the information available within two years from the publication of this Regulation.

  (8)

  For metolachlor and S-metolachlor, the Authority submitted a reasoned opinion on the existing MRLs in accordance with Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 in conjunction with Article 12(1) thereof (8). It recommended lowering the MRLs for linseed, sunflower seed, rape seed, soya bean, cotton seed and pumpkin seeds. For other products it recommended keeping the existing MRLs or setting MRLs at the level identified by the Authority. It concluded that concerning the MRLs for strawberries and pineapple some information was not available and that further consideration by risk managers was required. As there is no risk for consumers, MRLs for those products should be set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 at the existing level or the level identified by the Authority. Those MRLs will be reviewed; the review will take into account the information available within two years from the publication of this Regulation.

  (9)

  For milbemectin, the Authority submitted a reasoned opinion on the existing MRLs in accordance with Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 in conjunction with Article 12(1) thereof (9). It proposed to change the residue definition. It recommended lowering the MRLs for pome fruits and strawberries. For hops it recommended raising the MRLs.

  (10)

  As regards products for which no relevant authorisations or import tolerances were reported at European Union level and no Codex MRL was available, the Authority concluded that further consideration by risk managers was required. Taking into account the current scientific and technical knowledge, MRLs for those products should be set at the specific limit of determination or at the default MRL in accordance with Article 18(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.

  (11)

  Based on the reasoned opinions of the Authority and taking into account the factors relevant to the matter under consideration, the appropriate modifications to the MRLs fulfil the requirements of Article 14(2) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.

  (12)

  Through the World Trade Organisation, the trading partners of the Union were consulted on the new MRLs and their comments have been taken into account.

  (13)

  A reasonable period should be allowed to elapse before the modified MRLs become applicable in order to permit Member States and interested parties to prepare themselves to meet the new requirements which will result from the modification of the MRLs.

  (14)

  Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, Parts A and B of Annex III, and Annex V to that Regulation should therefore be amended accordingly.

  (15)

  In order to allow for the normal marketing, processing and consumption of products, this Regulation should provide for a transitional arrangement for products which have been lawfully produced before the modification of the MRLs and for which information shows that a high level of consumer protection is maintained.

  (16)

  The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and neither the European Parliament nor the Council has opposed them,

  HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

  Article 1

  Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

  Article 2

  Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 as it stood before being amended by this Regulation shall continue to apply to products which were lawfully produced before 6 July 2014.

  Article 3

  This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

  It shall apply from 6 July 2014.

  This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

  Done at Brussels, 16 December 2013.

  For the Commission

  The President

  Jos Manuel BARROSO 原文及附件下载:(EU) No 1317_2013.pdf

地区9/font>欧盟
标签9/font>最大残留限?nbsp;
食品伙伴网提供标准法规解读、舆情监控、合规咨询、申报注册等服务、br/>电询?535-2129301
QQ?891238009
食品标法? border=
实时把握 食品标法动?/span>
请扫码关?span class="color2">食品标法圇/span>

声明9/p>

凡本网所有原?编译文章及图片、图表的版权均属食品伙伴网所有,如要转载,需注明“信息来源:食品伙伴网”、br> 凡本网注明“信息来源:XXX(非食品伙伴网)”的作品,均转载自其他媒体,转载目的在于传递更多的信息,并不代表本网赞同其观点和对其真实性负责、br> 邮箱:law#www.sqrdapp.com(发邮件时请?换成@ QQ?39307733

[ 政策法规搜索] [ 加入收藏] [ 告诉好友] [ 打印本文] [ 关闭窗口]


按分类浏觇/strong>
推荐国外法规
点击排行
    按国家或地区浏览

    法规中心 关于我们 广告业务 联系我们 信息服务

    Processed in 0.181 second(s), 13 queries, Memory 4.49 M
    Baidu
    map