褰撳墠浣嶇疆: 棣栭〉 » 鏀跨瓥娉曡 » 鍥藉娉曡 »2003/91/EC 鏍规嵁鐞嗕簨浼氭寚浠�95/53/EC鍒跺畾2003骞村姩鐗╄惀鍏荤殑鍗忚皟妫€鏌ユ柟妗�(On the coordinated inspection programme in the field of animal nutrition for the year 2003 in accordance with Council Directive 95/53/EC)

2003/91/EC 鏍规嵁鐞嗕簨浼氭寚浠�95/53/EC鍒跺畾2003骞村姩鐗╄惀鍏荤殑鍗忚皟妫€鏌ユ柟妗�(On the coordinated inspection programme in the field of animal nutrition for the year 2003 in accordance with Council Directive 95/53/EC)

鎵弿浜岀淮鐮� 鍒嗕韩濂藉弸鍜屾湅鍙嬪湀
鏀惧ぇ瀛椾綋  缂╁皬瀛椾綋 2011-05-11 13:43:02  鏉ユ簮锛�EUROPA  娴忚娆℃暟锛�3977
鏍稿績鎻愮ず锛氳濮斿憳浼氬缓璁悇鎴愬憳鍥藉缓绔�2003骞寸殑鍗忚皟鐩戞帶鏂规锛屽叾涓洃鎺ч」鐩寘鎷檮褰旾涓姩鐗╂簮浜у搧鐨勭敓浜у拰浣跨敤鐨勮绔犳槸鍚﹁鏈夋晥鎵ц銆侀檮褰旾I涓姞宸ュ鑷村伐涓氬壇浜у搧浜屾伓鑻辩殑姹℃煋銆佹姉鐢熺礌淇冪敓闀垮墏浣跨敤鏂归潰鐨勬硶寰嬫槸鍚﹁鏈夋晥鎵ц绛夊唴瀹广€�
鍙戝竷鍗曚綅
娆х洘濮斿憳浼�
娆х洘濮斿憳浼�
鍙戝竷鏂囧彿 2003/91/EC
鍙戝竷鏃ユ湡 2003-02-11 鐢熸晥鏃ユ湡 鏆傛棤
鏈夋晥鎬х姸鎬� 搴熸鏃ユ湡 鏆傛棤
澶囨敞 璇ュ鍛樹細寤鸿鍚勬垚鍛樺浗寤虹珛2003骞寸殑鍗忚皟鐩戞帶鏂规锛屽叾涓洃鎺ч」鐩寘鎷檮褰旾涓姩鐗╂簮浜у搧鐨勭敓浜у拰浣跨敤鐨勮绔犳槸鍚﹁鏈夋晥鎵ц銆侀檮褰旾I涓姞宸ュ鑷村伐涓氬壇浜у搧浜屾伓鑻辩殑姹℃煋銆佹姉鐢熺礌淇冪敓闀垮墏浣跨敤鏂归潰鐨勬硶寰嬫槸鍚﹁鏈夋晥鎵ц绛夊唴瀹广€�

銆€銆€THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

銆€銆€Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

銆€銆€Having regard to Council Directive 95/53/EC of 25 October 1995 fixing the principles governing the organisation of official inspections in the field of animal nutrition锛�1锛�, as last amended by Directive 2001/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council锛�2锛�, and in particular Article 22锛�3锛� thereof,

銆€銆€Whereas:

銆€銆€锛�1锛� Directive 95/53/EC provides for the Commission to submit an overall summary report on the result of inspections carried out at Community level. The overall summary report on inspection activities carried out in the field of animal nutrition based on the information provided by the Member States concerning the implementation of the inspection programmes for the year 2001 does not allow definitive conclusions to be drawn.

銆€銆€锛�2锛� Three priority criteria have been identified as worthy of a coordinated inspection programme to be carried out in the year 2003, namely the monitoring of application of restrictions on the use of products of animal origin in feedingstuffs, the presence of dioxins in by-products used as feed materials for the manufacture of feedingstuffs and the presence of antibiotics banned as growth promoters in feedingstuffs.

銆€銆€锛�3锛� It is important to ensure that the restrictions on the use of products of animal origin in feedingstuffs, as laid down in the relevant Community legislation, are effectively enforced.

銆€銆€锛�4锛� Certain industrial by-products intended to be used as feed materials could potentially become contaminated with dioxins as a result of processing.

銆€銆€锛�5锛� It is important to ensure that banned antibiotics are not used as growth promoters in animal nutrition.

銆€銆€锛�6锛� The measures provided for in this recommendation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

銆€銆€HEREBY RECOMMENDS:

銆€銆€1. It is recommended that Member States carry out during the year 2003 a coordinated monitoring programme aiming to check:

銆€銆€锛坅锛� the implementation of restrictions on the production and use of products of animal origin as set out in Annex I;

銆€銆€锛坆锛� the contamination of certain industrial by-products with dioxins as a result of processing as set out in Annex II;

銆€銆€锛坈锛� the presence of banned antibiotics used as growth promoters as set out in Annex III.

銆€銆€2. It is recommended that Member States include the results of the coordinated monitoring programme provided for in paragraph 1, as a separate chapter in the report on the annual control activities to be transmitted by 1 April 2004 in accordance with Article 22 of Directive 95/53/EC.

銆€銆€Done at Brussels, 10 February 2003.

銆€銆€For the Commission

銆€銆€David Byrne

銆€銆€Member of the Commission

銆€銆€锛�1锛� OJ L 265, 8.11.1995, p. 17.

銆€銆€锛�2锛� OJ L 234, 1.9.2001, p. 55.

銆€銆€ANNEX I

銆€銆€RESTRICTIONS ON THE PRODUCTION AND USE OF PRODUCTS OF ANIMAL ORIGIN

銆€銆€Without prejudice to Articles 3 to 13 and 15 of Directive 95/53/EC, Member States should, during 2003, undertake a coordinated inspection programme to determine whether restrictions on the production and use of feed materials of animal origin have been complied with.

銆€銆€In particular, in order to ensure that the ban on feeding processed animal protein to certain animals, as laid down in Council Decision 2000/766/EC锛�1锛� and Commission Decision 2001/9/EC锛�2锛�, both last amended by Commission Decision 2002/248/EC锛�3锛� is effectively applied, Member States should implement a specific control programme based on targeted controls. In accordance with Article 4 of Directive 95/53/EC, that control programme should be based on a risk-based strategy where all stages of production and all types of premises where feed is produced, handled and administered are included. Member States should pay special attention to the definition of criteria that can be related to a risk. The weighting given to each criterion should be proportional to the risk. The inspection frequency and the number of samples analysed in the premises should be in correlation to the sum of weightings allocated to those premises.

銆€銆€The following indicative premises and criteria should be considered when drawing up a control programme:

Premises Criteria Weighting
Feed mills

銆€銆€— Double stream feed mills producing ruminant compound

銆€銆€feed and non-ruminant compound feed containing derogated

銆€銆€processed animal proteins

銆€銆€— Feed mills with previous history, or suspicion, of non-compliance

銆€銆€— Feed mills with a high amount of imported feedingstuffs of

銆€銆€high protein content such as fish meal, soybean meal, corn

銆€銆€gluten meal and protein concentrates

銆€銆€— Feed mills with a high amount of production of compound

銆€銆€feed

銆€銆€— Risk of cross-contamination resulting from internal operational

銆€銆€procedures 锛坰uch as dedication of silos, control of the

銆€銆€effective separation of lines, control of ingredients, internal

銆€銆€laboratory, sampling procedures.锛�

 

銆€銆€Border Inspection Posts and

銆€銆€other points of entry into

銆€銆€the Community

銆€銆€— High/low amount of imports of feedingstuffs

銆€銆€— Feedingstuffs with a high protein content

 
Farms

銆€銆€— Home mixers using derogated processed animal proteins

銆€銆€— Farms keeping ruminants and other species 锛坮isk of crossfeeding锛�

銆€銆€— Farms purchasing feedingstuffs in bulk

 
Dealers

銆€銆€— Warehouses and intermediate storage of feedingstuffs with a

銆€銆€high protein content

銆€銆€— High volume of bulk feedingstuffs traded

銆€銆€— Dealers in compound feedingstuffs produced abroad

 
Mobile mixers

銆€銆€— Mixers producing for several species

銆€銆€— Mixers with previous history, or suspicion, of non-compliance

銆€銆€— Mixers incorporating feedingstuffs with a high protein

銆€銆€content

銆€銆€— Mixers with a high amount of production of feedingstuffs

銆€銆€— Large number of farms served including farms which keep

銆€銆€ruminants

 
Means of transportation

銆€銆€— Vehicles used for the transportation of processed animal

銆€銆€proteins and feedingstuffs

銆€銆€— Vehicles with previous history, or suspicion, of non-compliance

 

銆€銆€As an alternative, Member States may forward their own risk assessment to the Commission before 31 March 2003.

銆€銆€Sampling should be targeted on batches or events where cross-contamination with prohibited processed proteins is most likely 锛坋.g. first batch after the transport of feedingstuffs containing animal protein prohibited in this batch, technical problems or changes in production lines, changes in storage bunkers or silos for bulk material锛�.

銆€銆€The minimum number of inspections per year in a Member State should be 10 per 100000 tonnes of compound feed produced. The minimum number of official samples per year in a Member State should be 20 per 100000 tonnes of compound feed produced. Pending the approval of alternative methods, the microscopic identification and estimation as laid down in Commission Directive 98/88/EC of 13 November 1998 establishing guidelines for the microscopic identification and estimation of constituents of animal origin for the official control of feedingstuffs锛�4锛� should be used for the analysis of the samples. Any presence of prohibited constituents of animal origin in feedingstuffs should be considered as a breach of the feed ban.

銆€銆€The results of the inspection programmes should be communicated to the Commission using the following formats.

銆€銆€SUMMARY OF CHECKS CONCERNING FEEDING RESTRICTIONS FOR FEED OF ANIMAL ORIGIN 锛團EEDING OF PROHIBITED PROCESSED ANIMAL PROTEINS锛�

銆€銆€A. Documented inspection銆€

銆€銆€B. Sampling and testing of feed materials and compound feedingstuffs for processed animal proteins

銆€銆€C. Summary on prohibited processed animal proteins found in samples of feedingstuffs intended for ruminants

銆€銆€锛�1锛� OJ L 306, 7.12.2000, p. 32.

銆€銆€锛�2锛� OJ L 2, 5.1.2001, p. 32.

銆€銆€锛�3锛� OJ L 84, 28.3.2002, p. 71.

銆€銆€锛�4锛� OJ L 318, 27.11.1998, p. 45.

銆€銆€ANNEX II

銆€銆€CONTAMINATION OF CERTAIN INDUSTRIAL BY-PRODUCTS WITH DIOXINS AS A RESULT OF DRYING OR OTHER TYPES OF PROCESSING

銆€銆€Many by-products of food processing are used as feed materials. Special attention should be paid to a possible contamination of these by-products, which may occur at certain steps of their production process namely when chemical substances such as catalysts, solvents, pelleting aids, pH modifiers or filtration agents are introduced.

銆€銆€Furthermore, extraction processes such as oil from oilseeds, palm kernels or coconut products sometimes involve the use of organic solvents. The presence of dioxins as solvent contaminants, but also the possible genesis of these compounds from chemical reactions between the solvent and feed materials may contribute to the contamination of the by-products 锛坥ilseed cakes锛� of the oil industry used as feed materials.

銆€銆€Particular attention should also be paid to the drying process used for the by-products. Drying of these by-products/feed materials such as green forage, sugar beet pulp or citrus pulp may involve atmospheric air flow or hot air generated by a non-polluting source, for example electric heating or heat exchange. Under these circumstances no dioxin contamination can be expected. However, other drying techniques involving direct contact between feed materials and an air flow heated by a direct combustion process and carrying combustion products 锛坓ases, smoke锛� may constitute a considerable pollution source highly dependent on the nature of the fuel used. Whereas natural gas is regarded as a clean energy source, other sources 锛坕.e. oil and derivatives including additives, pit-coal, wood锛� may generate dioxins during the combustion process, especially if combustion is incomplete. High levels of dioxins on dried green forage have been reported, caused by a direct drying process whereby chemically treated 锛坵ith paint, with pentachlorophenol锛� waste wood was used as a burning material.

銆€銆€Increased control of these feed materials "at risk" is appropriate. In order to be able to identify precisely the source of contamination, an additional investigation is necessary if an increased level is found 锛坰ee Commission Recommendation 2002/201/EC of 4 March 2002 on the reduction of the presence of dioxins, furans and PCBs in feedingstuffs and foodstuffs锛�1锛夛級.

銆€銆€A. Summary on contamination of by-products with dioxins

銆€銆€锛�1锛� OJ L 67, 9.3.2002, p. 69.

銆€銆€ANNEX III

銆€銆€PRESENCE OF BANNED ANTIBIOTICS USED AS GROWTH PROMOTERS

銆€銆€Antibiotics may be legally present in feedingstuffs when prescribed by a veterinarian for disease prevention and treatment. Council Directive 90/167/EEC lays down the conditions governing the preparation, placing on the market and use of medicated feedingstuffs in the Community锛�1锛�.

銆€銆€Antibiotics may also be legally present when authorised under Council Directive 70/524/EEC of 23 November concerning additives in feedingstuffs锛�2锛�, for coccidiosis prevention or growth promotion purposes. In the latter category only monensin-sodium, salinomycine-sodium, flavophospholipol and avilamycine are currently authorised.

銆€銆€Any other use of antibiotics is not authorised in feedingstuffs.

銆€銆€During 2001 some Member States found a significant number of samples of feedingstuffs where the presence of unauthorised antibiotics was detected.

銆€銆€Increased control on feedingstuffs is therefore appropriate. In order to develop appropriate control strategies, additional investigations should be carried out when unauthorised antibiotics are detected in order to identify the cause of their presence in feedingstuffs.

銆€銆€A. Summary on banned antibiotics used as growth promoters found in samples of feedingstuffs

銆€銆€>PIC FILE= "L_2003034EN.002502.TIF">

銆€銆€锛�1锛� OJ L 92, 7.4.1990, p. 42.

銆€銆€锛�2锛� OJ L 270, 14.12.1970, p. 1.


椋熷搧浼欎即缃戞彁渚涙爣鍑嗘硶瑙勮В璇汇€佽垎鎯呯洃鎺с€佸悎瑙勫挩璇€€佺敵鎶ユ敞鍐岀瓑鏈嶅姟銆�
鐢佃锛�0535-2129301
QQ锛�2891238009
椋熷搧鏍囨硶鍦�
瀹炴椂鎶婃彙椋熷搧鏍囨硶鍔ㄦ€�
璇锋壂鐮佸叧娉�椋熷搧鏍囨硶鍦�

澹版槑锛�

鈶� 鍑℃湰缃戞墍鏈夊師濮�/缂栬瘧鏂囩珷鍙婂浘鐗囥€佸浘琛ㄧ殑鐗堟潈鍧囧睘椋熷搧浼欎即缃戞墍鏈夛紝濡傝杞浇锛岄渶娉ㄦ槑鈥滀俊鎭潵婧愶細椋熷搧浼欎即缃戔€濄€�
鈶� 鍑℃湰缃戞敞鏄庘€滀俊鎭潵婧愶細XXX锛堥潪椋熷搧浼欎即缃戯級鈥濈殑浣滃搧锛屽潎杞浇鑷叾浠栧獟浣擄紝杞浇鐩殑鍦ㄤ簬浼犻€掓洿澶氱殑淇℃伅锛屽苟涓嶄唬琛ㄦ湰缃戣禐鍚屽叾瑙傜偣鍜屽鍏剁湡瀹炴€ц礋璐c€�
鈥� 閭锛歭aw#www.sqrdapp.com锛堝彂閭欢鏃惰灏�#鎹㈡垚@锛� QQ锛�139307733

 
 
[ 鏀跨瓥娉曡鎼滅储 ]  [ 鍔犲叆鏀惰棌 ]  [ 鍛婅瘔濂藉弸 ]  [ 鎵撳嵃鏈枃 ]  [ 鍏抽棴绐楀彛 ]

 

 
 
鎸夊垎绫绘祻瑙�
鎺ㄨ崘鍥藉娉曡
鐐瑰嚮鎺掕
    鎸夊浗瀹舵垨鍦板尯娴忚

    娉曡涓績銆€ 鍏充簬鎴戜滑銆€ 骞垮憡涓氬姟銆€ 鑱旂郴鎴戜滑銆€ 淇℃伅鏈嶅姟

    Processed in 0.380 second(s), 10 queries, Memory 4.51 M
    Baidu
    map