当前位置: 首页? 政策法规? 国外法规? 2009/859/EC 关于理事会指?1/414/EEC的附件I中不包含二苯胺,并废除二苯胺在植物保护产品中的授杂/a>

2009/859/EC 关于理事会指?1/414/EEC的附件I中不包含二苯胺,并废除二苯胺在植物保护产品中的授杂/h1>
扫描二维 分享好友和朋友圈
放大字体缩小字体2011-04-26 03:58:14 来源:EUROPA 浏览次数9span id="hits">3163
核心提示:该决议规定含有二苯胺的植物保护产品授权截止?010??0日将被撤回。自发布之日起,任何含有二苯胺的植物保护产品将不被授权、/div>
发布单位
欧盟委员
欧盟委员伙/div>
发布文号 2009/859/EC
发布日期 2009-12-01 生效日期 暂无
有效性状?/th> 废止日期 暂无
备注 该决议规定含有二苯胺的植物保护产品授权截止到2010??0日将被撤回。自发布之日起,任何含有二苯胺的植物保护产品将不被授权、/td>

  Commission Decision

  of 30 November 2009

  concerning the non-inclusion of diphenylamine in Annex I to Council Directive91/414/EECand the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance

  (notified under document C?009 9262(/p>

  (Text with EEA relevance(/p>

  ?009/859/EC(/p>

  THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

  Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

  Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market [1], and in particular the fourth subparagraph of Article 8? thereof,

  Whereas:

  ? Article 8? of Directive 91/414/EEC provides that a Member State may, during a period of 12 years following the notification of that Directive, authorise the placing on the market of plant protection products containing active substances not listed in Annex I to that Directive that are already on the market two years after the date of notification, while those substances are gradually being examined within the framework of a programme of work.

  ? Commission Regulations (EC No 451/2000 [2] and (EC No 1490/2002 [3] lay down the detailed rules for the implementation of the third stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8? of Directive 91/414/EEC and establish a list of active substances to be assessed with a view to their possible inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. That list includes diphenylamine.

  ? For diphenylamine the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed in accordance with the provisions laid down in Regulations (EC No 451/2000 and (EC No 1490/2002 for a range of uses proposed by the notifier. Moreover, those Regulations designate the rapporteur Member States which have to submit the relevant assessment reports and recommendations to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA in accordance with Article 10? of Regulation (EC No 1490/2002. For diphenylamine the rapporteur Member State was Ireland and all relevant information was submitted on 20 June 2007.

  ? The assessment report has been peer reviewed by the Member States and the EFSA within its Working Group evaluation and presented to the Commission on 30 September 2008 in the format of the EFSA conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance diphenylamine [4]. This report has been reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 26 February 2009 in the format of the Commission review report for diphenylamine.

  ? During the evaluation of this active substance, a number of concerns have been identified. In particular, it was not possible to perform a reliable consumer exposure assessment, as data are missing on the presence and toxicity of unidentified metabolites of the substance, as well as on the possible formation of nitrosamines during storage of the active substance and during processing of treated apples. Moreover, no data was available on the potential breakdown or reaction product of diphenylamine residues in processed commodities. Consequently, it was not possible to conclude on the basis of the information available that diphenylamine met the criteria for inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.

  ? The Commission invited the notifier to submit its comments on the results of the peer review and on its intention or not to further support the substance. The notifier submitted its comments which have been carefully examined. However, despite the arguments put forward by the notifier, the concerns identified could not be eliminated, and assessments made on the basis of the information submitted and evaluated during the EFSA expert meetings have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing diphenylamine satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5?)(a and (b of Directive 91/414/EEC.

  ? Diphenylamine should therefore not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.

  ? Measures should be taken to ensure that authorisations granted for plant protection products containing diphenylamine are withdrawn within a fixed period of time and are not renewed and that no new authorisations for such products are granted.

  ? Any period of grace granted by a Member State for the disposal, storage, placing on the market and use of existing stocks of plant protection products containing diphenylamine should be limited to 12 months in order to allow existing stocks to be used in one further growing season, which ensures that plant protection products containing diphenylamine remain available to farmers for 18 months from the adoption of this Decision.

  ?0 This Decision does not prejudice the submission of an application for diphenylamine according to the provisions of Article 6? of Directive 91/414/EEC, the detailed implementation rules of which have been laid down in Commission Regulation (EC No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8? of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I [5], in view of a possible inclusion in its Annex I.

  ?1 The Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health did not deliver an opinion on the measures provided for in this Decision within the time limit laid down by its Chairman and the Commission therefore submitted to the Council a proposal relating to these measures. Since, on the expiry of the period laid down in the second subparagraph of Article 19? of Directive 91/414/EEC, the Council had neither adopted the proposed measures nor indicated its opposition to them, they should be adopted by the Commission,

  HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

  Article 1

  Diphenylamine shall not be included as an active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.

  Article 2

  Member States shall ensure that:

  (a authorisations for plant protection products containing diphenylamine are withdrawn by 30 May 2010;

  (b no authorisations for plant protection products containing diphenylamine are granted or renewed from the date of publication of this Decision.

  Article 3

  Any period of grace granted by Member States in accordance with the provisions of Article 4? of Directive 91/414/EEC, shall be as short as possible and shall expire on 30 May 2011 at the latest.

  Article 4

  This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

  Done at Brussels, 30 November 2009.

  For the Commission

  Androulla Vassiliou

  Member of the Commission

  [1] OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1.

  [2] OJ L 55, 29.2.2000, p. 25.

  [3] OJ L 224, 21.8.2002, p. 23.

  [4] EFSA Scientific Report ?008? 188. Conclusion on the peer review of diphenylamine (finalised 30 September 2008?

  [5] OJ L 15, 18.1.2008, p. 5.

  更多关于欧盟食品饲料农药残留限量相关法规,请点击欧盟食品饲料农药残留限量法规汇怺/a>

食品伙伴网提供标准法规解读、舆情监控、合规咨询、申报注册等服务、br/>电询?535-2129301
QQ?891238009
食品标法? border=
实时把握 食品标法动?/span>
请扫码关?span class="color2">食品标法圇/span>

声明9/p>

凡本网所有原?编译文章及图片、图表的版权均属食品伙伴网所有,如要转载,需注明“信息来源:食品伙伴网”、br> 凡本网注明“信息来源:XXX(非食品伙伴网)”的作品,均转载自其他媒体,转载目的在于传递更多的信息,并不代表本网赞同其观点和对其真实性负责、br> 邮箱:law#www.sqrdapp.com(发邮件时请?换成@ QQ?39307733

[ 政策法规搜索] [ 加入收藏] [ 告诉好友] [ 打印本文] [ 关闭窗口]


按分类浏觇/strong>
推荐国外法规
点击排行
    按国家或地区浏览

    法规中心 关于我们 广告业务 联系我们 信息服务

    Processed in 0.144 second(s), 11 queries, Memory 4.43 M
    Baidu
    map